ABSTRACT
Yoghurt was produced from blends of
milk obtained from coconut milk, soybean milk and cow milk by fermentation
using starter cultures of Lacto bacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus
thermophilus. Physico-chemical, sensory evaluation and microbial analysis were
carried out. The results of the physico chemical analysis showed that the raw
material had moisture content of 71.61% to 88.32%, ash content of 0.73% to
1.12%, fat content of 1.49% to 2.27%, total solid content of 24.40% to 11.68%,
protein content of 4.6 1% to 2.75%, pH of 5.90% to 6.24%, viscosity of
217.00mPa to 187.20mPa, TTA of 0.51% to 0.78%, brix of 7.92% to 5.81%
respectively while the yoghurt samples had moisture content of 77.14% to
77.66%, fat content of 1.14% to 1.31%, total solid of 22.87% to 18.36%, ash
content of 1.18% to 0.62%, protein content of 5.47% to 3.97%, pH content of
5.51% to 6.75%, TTA of 0.41% to 1.01%, viscosity of 208.30mPa to 170.40mPa,
brix of 8.12% to 7.12%, lactose content of 7.23% to 4.31% respectively. The
acceptability of the yoghurt produced was investigated in a sensory evaluation
study. The sensory evaluation analysis of the samples indicated that the
yoghurt produced from blends of cow milk, coconut milk, soy milk 40%, 20%,
40%(CCSY424) did not differ significantly (P>0.05) from the cow milk
yoghurt(CMY100). The nutritional values obtained from the proximate analysis of
the yoghurt samples were comparable, therefore the yoghurt produced from blends
of cow milk, coconut milk, soy milk 40%,20%,40%(CCSY424) compares well with cow
milk yoghurt nutritionally and organoleptically. The microbial load recorded
for samples inoculated with Nutrient Agar ranged from 1.3 x104to 2.8
xlO4cfu/ml, the samples inoculated with TVC had no growth except for sample
RCCM (raw coconut milk) which had 4x103cfu/ml. The samples inoculated with SSA
were found to have no growth, samples inoculated with MSA had result ranging
from 8 x103to 3.5x104cfu/ml, while those inoculated with MRS ranged from 5
x103to 2.9 x104cfu/ml with no growth recorded in RSM. Bacteria which were
isolated from the milk and yoghurt samples were Staphylococcus spp, Bacillus
spp, Lacto bacillus spp, Enterobacter.
UZOMACHUKWU, M (2021). Production And Quality Evaluation Of Yoghurt From Blends Of Soymilk, Coconut Milk And Cow Milk. . Mouau.afribary.org: Retrieved Nov 25, 2024, from https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/production-and-quality-evaluation-of-yoghurt-from-blends-of-soymilk-coconut-milk-and-cow-milk-7-2
M., UZOMACHUKWU. "Production And Quality Evaluation Of Yoghurt From Blends Of Soymilk, Coconut Milk And Cow Milk. " Mouau.afribary.org. Mouau.afribary.org, 04 Aug. 2021, https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/production-and-quality-evaluation-of-yoghurt-from-blends-of-soymilk-coconut-milk-and-cow-milk-7-2. Accessed 25 Nov. 2024.
M., UZOMACHUKWU. "Production And Quality Evaluation Of Yoghurt From Blends Of Soymilk, Coconut Milk And Cow Milk. ". Mouau.afribary.org, Mouau.afribary.org, 04 Aug. 2021. Web. 25 Nov. 2024. < https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/production-and-quality-evaluation-of-yoghurt-from-blends-of-soymilk-coconut-milk-and-cow-milk-7-2 >.
M., UZOMACHUKWU. "Production And Quality Evaluation Of Yoghurt From Blends Of Soymilk, Coconut Milk And Cow Milk. " Mouau.afribary.org (2021). Accessed 25 Nov. 2024. https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/production-and-quality-evaluation-of-yoghurt-from-blends-of-soymilk-coconut-milk-and-cow-milk-7-2