ABSTRACT
An attempt was made to formulate low-cost, nutritive but bulk-reduced complementary food from maize and soyabeans using 3 traditional technologies, (Malting, Fermentation and Roasting). The nutritive fat, crude fiber, total ash and minerals contents. The Functional properties (such as bulk-density, water absorption capacity, wettability and relative viscosity) and sensory properties of the complementary foods were also evaluated. Feeding trials were also carried out using albino rats to evaluate the growth promoting quality of the complementary foods. Malted complementary food had the lowest water absorption capacity (2.02) followed by fermented complementary food (2.18) and then roasted complementary food. Relative viscosity was lowest in fermented complementary food (28.5), followed by malted complementary (35.23) and then roasted complementary food (65.23). Animal studies indicated good growth and development in rats fed with the complementary foods. The protein efficiency ratio of rats fed the malted complementary food (2.96) was the highest. There was no significant difference between the PER of rats fed the fermented complementary food (2.86) and those on casein diet (2.73). Sensory evaluation showed that there was no significant difference between the general acceptability of malted complementary food and that of Nutrend (a commercially produced complementary food). Malting, fermentation and Roasting were used to produce complementary foods that have satisfactory functional characteristics and nutritive value and are hence recommended.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title page
Certification ii
Declaration ii
Dedication iv
Acknowledgement v
Table of Contents vi-
List of Tables ix
List of Figures x
Abstract
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Objective of Study
3
1.2 Justification of
Study 3
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE
REVIEW
2.1 Compementary Foods
5
2.2 Traditional
Complementary Foods 7
2.3 Development of
Complementary foods 10
2.4 Traditional
Processing Methods 12
2.4.1. MaIfing 12
2.4.2. Fermentation 14
2.4.3. Heating
(Roasting) 16
2.5 Legumes and
anti-nutritional Factors 16
2.6 Rheology, Viscosity
and Food Texture 18
2.6.1. Rheology of Food
18
2.6.2. Viscosity,
texture of Foo and Gelatonization 18
2.7 Quality Evaluation
of Complementary foods 20
CHAPTER 3: MATERIALS
AND METHODS
3.1 Selection of Raw
Materials 23
3.2 Preparation of
Complementary food Blends 23
3.2.1 Malted
Complementary food 23
3.2.2 Fermented
Complementary food Blend 26
3.2.3 Roasted
Complementary food Blend 28
3.2.4 Fortification 29
3.3 Proximate Analysis
30
3.3.1 Determination of
Crude Protein CoRtent 30
3.3.2 Determination of
Ash Content 30
3.3.3 Determination of
crude Fat Content 31
3.3.4 Determination of
Crude Fibre Content 31
3.3.5 Determination of
Moisture Content 32
3.3.6 Determination of
total carbohydrate 32
3.4 Physical and
Functional Properties 32
3.4.1 pH 33
3.4.2 Bulk Density 33
3.4.3 Wettability 33
3.4.4 Water Absorption
Capacity 33
3.4.5 Gelation Property
34
3.4.6 Relative
Viscosity 34
3.5 Sensory Evaluation
34
3.6 Feeding Trial 35
CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION
4.1 Proximate and
Mineral Composition of
the complementary food
Ble. 37
4.2 Physical and
Functional Properties of
the complementary food
Blends 38
4.3. Animal Response 43
4.4 Sensory Evaluation
50
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION
AND RECOMMENDATION 51
REFERENCES 53
APPENDICES 59
EZEOCITA, V (2021). Effect Of Traditional Processing Methods On Tile Physico-Chemical And Nutritional Quality Of Maize And Soyabean Based Complimentary Food. Mouau.afribary.org: Retrieved Nov 16, 2024, from https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/effect-of-traditional-processing-methods-on-tile-physico-chemical-and-nutritional-quality-of-maize-and-soyabean-based-complimentary-food-7-2
VANESSA, EZEOCITA. "Effect Of Traditional Processing Methods On Tile Physico-Chemical And Nutritional Quality Of Maize And Soyabean Based Complimentary Food" Mouau.afribary.org. Mouau.afribary.org, 24 May. 2021, https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/effect-of-traditional-processing-methods-on-tile-physico-chemical-and-nutritional-quality-of-maize-and-soyabean-based-complimentary-food-7-2. Accessed 16 Nov. 2024.
VANESSA, EZEOCITA. "Effect Of Traditional Processing Methods On Tile Physico-Chemical And Nutritional Quality Of Maize And Soyabean Based Complimentary Food". Mouau.afribary.org, Mouau.afribary.org, 24 May. 2021. Web. 16 Nov. 2024. < https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/effect-of-traditional-processing-methods-on-tile-physico-chemical-and-nutritional-quality-of-maize-and-soyabean-based-complimentary-food-7-2 >.
VANESSA, EZEOCITA. "Effect Of Traditional Processing Methods On Tile Physico-Chemical And Nutritional Quality Of Maize And Soyabean Based Complimentary Food" Mouau.afribary.org (2021). Accessed 16 Nov. 2024. https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/effect-of-traditional-processing-methods-on-tile-physico-chemical-and-nutritional-quality-of-maize-and-soyabean-based-complimentary-food-7-2