ABSTRACT
Ice cream was produced from blends
of tigernut milk and cow milk using synthetic food binders (gelatin and CMC) at
the same concentration (0.5%, with 100% cow milk) and natural food binder (taro
starch) at different concentrations (0.7% and 0.8%, with three blends for each
concentration: 70% tigernut milk and 30% cow milk, 30% tigernut milk and 70%
cow milk, 50% tigernut milk and 50% cow milk) to find the best concentration
that will be a suitable replacer for gelatin and CMC. The ice cream made from
100% cow milk at 0.5% gelatin and 0.5% CMC differently served as the control
samples 1&2 (301 and 401) respectively. The chemical and physical
properties of the products were evaluated also the microbial analysis. The
chemical composition showed that sample 101 (0.7% taro starch with 70% tigernut
milk and 30% cow milk) had the highest percentage crude protein content of
3.06% which decreased as the concentration of taro starch increased while the
control sample 2, 401 (0.5% CMC with 100% cow milk) had the least value of
2.29%. The percentage crude lipid content ranged from 0.76% to 1.61%, with
samples treated with taro starch having higher value than the control samples.
The ash content ranged between 0.3 8%. The percentage total solids decreased as
concentration of taro starch decreased. The percentage TTA was highest in the
control sample 2 (401) having a value of 1.3 1% and least value (0.61%) in
sample 203 (0.8% taro starch with 50% tigernut milk and 50% cow milk).
Percentage lactose content ranged from 3.01% to 4.17%. While pH values ranged from
5.21% to 6.29%. In terms of the physical properties evaluated: Foam stability
and overrun increased with increase in taro starch concentration, but were
significantly lower than CMC and gelatin. Viscosity ranged from 136.65rpm to
157.90rpm. Microbiological analysis showed the range of the total microbial
load on different Medias as 2x103cfu/ml to 4.8x104cfu/ml. Finally, the results
of the sensory evaluation showed that sensory attributes did not improve with
increase in concentration of natural food binder (taro starch). This showed
that 0.7% taro starch concentration was the best concentration to replace CMC
and gelatin in ice cream.
NZEWI, C (2021). Comparative Quality Evaluation Of Tigernut-Cow Milk Ice Creams Produced From Synthetic Binders (Gelatin And CMC) And Natural Binder (Taro Starch).. Mouau.afribary.org: Retrieved Nov 25, 2024, from https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/comparative-quality-evaluation-of-tigernut-cow-milk-ice-creams-produced-from-synthetic-binders-gelatin-and-cmc-and-natural-binder-taro-starch-7-2
C, NZEWI. "Comparative Quality Evaluation Of Tigernut-Cow Milk Ice Creams Produced From Synthetic Binders (Gelatin And CMC) And Natural Binder (Taro Starch)." Mouau.afribary.org. Mouau.afribary.org, 20 Sep. 2021, https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/comparative-quality-evaluation-of-tigernut-cow-milk-ice-creams-produced-from-synthetic-binders-gelatin-and-cmc-and-natural-binder-taro-starch-7-2. Accessed 25 Nov. 2024.
C, NZEWI. "Comparative Quality Evaluation Of Tigernut-Cow Milk Ice Creams Produced From Synthetic Binders (Gelatin And CMC) And Natural Binder (Taro Starch).". Mouau.afribary.org, Mouau.afribary.org, 20 Sep. 2021. Web. 25 Nov. 2024. < https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/comparative-quality-evaluation-of-tigernut-cow-milk-ice-creams-produced-from-synthetic-binders-gelatin-and-cmc-and-natural-binder-taro-starch-7-2 >.
C, NZEWI. "Comparative Quality Evaluation Of Tigernut-Cow Milk Ice Creams Produced From Synthetic Binders (Gelatin And CMC) And Natural Binder (Taro Starch)." Mouau.afribary.org (2021). Accessed 25 Nov. 2024. https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/comparative-quality-evaluation-of-tigernut-cow-milk-ice-creams-produced-from-synthetic-binders-gelatin-and-cmc-and-natural-binder-taro-starch-7-2