ABSTRACT
The study focused on production and quality
evaluation oftomato (Jycopersicon esculentum) powder using different processing
methods. Tomato powders were produced from five different processing methods
(whole - RNW; removed skin -RSK; removed seed - RSD; removed skin and seed -
RSS; and removed seed and fluid - RSF). Proximate and energy composition,
functional properties, minerals, vitamin contents, physicochemical properties
and sensory properties ofthe tomato powders were evaluated using standard
procedures. The result of proximate composition showed that tomato powder
processed whole (RNW) had the highest moisture content (5.86%), total ash
(6.25%), crude fibre (7.71%) and total fat (4.04%) whereas tomato powder
processed without seed and fluid (RSF) had the highest dry matter content
(96.64%). Furthermore, tomato powder processed without skin and seed (RSS) had
the highest carbohydrate (79.47%) and energy value (361.51%). The result of
mineral content showed that tomato powder processed whole (RNW) had the highest
calcium (175.44 mg/lOOg), magnesium (216.34 mg/lOOg), phosphorus (242.03
mg/lOOg), potassium (477.12 mg/lOOg), iron (4.76 mg/lOOg) and zinc value (2.86
mg/lOOg). The vitamin A, vitamin B3, vitamin C, vitamin E, vitamin D and
vitamin K of tomato powder processed whole (RNW) was significantly higher
compared to all other tomato powder samples. With respect to functional
properties, the tomato powder processed whole (RNW) equally had a relatively
high values in bulk density (0.57 g/ml), oil absorption capacity (2.30 g/g),
water absorption capacity (3.10 g/g), foam capacity (19.27 g/ml), wettability
(52.70 mins) and swelling index (ml/g). In terms of physicochemical properties,
tomato powder processed without seed and fluid (RSF) scored highest in pH
(4.72), total soluble solids (6.27 g/lOOg), and total solids (96.64 g/lOOg)
whereas tomato powder processed whole (RNW) scored highest in total titratable
acidity (g/g). The result of sensory analysis showed that tomato powder
processed without seed and fluid (RSF) had an overall highest mean score in all
sensory attributes evaluated (appearance 5.75, Taste -6.15, Mouth feel- 5.70,
Aroma-6.10, Aftertaste - 5.95 and overall acceptability - 5.75). Tomato powder
processed without seed and fluid was more liked by the panelists compared to
other tomato powder samples.
MICHAEL, U (2026). Production And Quality Evaluation Of Tomato (Lycopersicon Esculentuni) Powder Using Different Processing Methods :-Onu, Victoria M . Mouau.afribary.org: Retrieved Apr 24, 2026, from https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/production-and-quality-evaluation-of-tomato-lycopersicon-esculentuni-powder-using-different-processing-methods-onu-victoria-m-7-2
UNIVERSITY, MICHAEL. "Production And Quality Evaluation Of Tomato (Lycopersicon Esculentuni) Powder Using Different Processing Methods :-Onu, Victoria M " Mouau.afribary.org. Mouau.afribary.org, 24 Apr. 2026, https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/production-and-quality-evaluation-of-tomato-lycopersicon-esculentuni-powder-using-different-processing-methods-onu-victoria-m-7-2. Accessed 24 Apr. 2026.
UNIVERSITY, MICHAEL. "Production And Quality Evaluation Of Tomato (Lycopersicon Esculentuni) Powder Using Different Processing Methods :-Onu, Victoria M ". Mouau.afribary.org, Mouau.afribary.org, 24 Apr. 2026. Web. 24 Apr. 2026. < https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/production-and-quality-evaluation-of-tomato-lycopersicon-esculentuni-powder-using-different-processing-methods-onu-victoria-m-7-2 >.
UNIVERSITY, MICHAEL. "Production And Quality Evaluation Of Tomato (Lycopersicon Esculentuni) Powder Using Different Processing Methods :-Onu, Victoria M " Mouau.afribary.org (2026). Accessed 24 Apr. 2026. https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/production-and-quality-evaluation-of-tomato-lycopersicon-esculentuni-powder-using-different-processing-methods-onu-victoria-m-7-2