ABSTRACT
The enzymatic potentials of microorganisms isolated from retting cassava were evaluated for the purpose of pectinase, cellulase and amylase activities. Cassava tubers of 12months old were collected from 3 different sources: 5 from Ahieke, 5 from Ndoru and 5 from Umuariga, they were handpeeled, cut into cylinders, washed, submerged into water and allowed to ret. After retting a dilution of the retted tubers were inoculated into different media plates: De-Man Rogosa Sharp agar, Sabouraud Dextrose agar, Nutrient agar, Mannitol salt agar and MacConkey agar and incubated at 300C for 3-5days. A total of 35 isolates was identified in the retting cassava samples which are bacteria 25(71.43%) and fungi 10(28.57%). The bacteria isolates identified include Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Lactobacillus spp and Proteus spp. While the 2 fungal isolates and 1yeast was identified which include Aspergillus niger, Rhodotorula spp and Saccharomyces cerevisiae respectively. The total viable count of the isolates in heterotrophic plate count, fungal plate count and lactic acid bacteria plate count were increasing as the retting hours increases from 1.94x106cfu/ml to 2.52x106cfu/ml, 1.823x106cfu/ml to 2.808x106cfu/ml and 1.712x106cfu/ml to 2.897x106cfu/ml respectively while coliform plate count and Staphylococcus plate count were decreasing from 2.014x106cfu/ml to 7.47x105cfu/ml and 2.131x106cfu/ml to 7.76x105cfu/ml respectively. The distribution of the isolates shows that Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Proteus spp dominated the beginning of the fermentation period while Lactobacillus spp, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergillus niger dominated the later stage of fermentation. Bacillus subtilis has the highest percentage occurrence 8(22.9%) while Rhodotorula spp has the lowest percentage occurrence 2(5.7%). The production of amylase enzyme was recorded with all the isolates with the exception of Staphylococcus aureus that produced none of the enzymes. Some of the isolates were able to produce cellulase enzyme while some produce pectinase enzyme. Proteus spp neither produced cellulase nor pectinase. Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of the bacteria isolates shows that Rifampicin and Gentamycin have a high level of sensitivity to all the isolates with 4(16.0%) and 5(20.0%) while chloramphenicol, Norfloxacin and amoxil have a high resistance to the isolates with 3(33.0%), 2(22.0%) and 2(22.0%) respectively. Results from this study shows that enzymes like amylase, pectinase and cellulase from microorganisms played an important role in retting of cassava tubers.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page i
Certification ii
Dedication iii
Acknowledgements iv
Table of contents v
List of tables viii
List of figures ix
Abstract x
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Introduction 1
1.1 Aim and Objectives 2
CHAPTER TWO
2.0 Literature Review 4
2.1 Nutritional and Anti-Nutritional Properties 4
2.2 Cyanogenic Glycosides 4
2.3 Toxicity of Cyanogens 9
2.4 Diseases Associated with Cassava Toxicity 10
2.4.1 Tropical Ataxic Neuropathy (TAN) 10
2.4.2 Konzo 11
2.4.3 Hyperthyroidism 11
2.4.4 Spastic Paraparesis 12
2.4.5 Other Diseases 12
2.5 Cassava Processing 12
2.6 Soaking (Retting) 13
2.7 Fermentation 13
2.7.1 Solid State Fermentation (SSF) 14
2.7.2 Submerged Fermentation (SMF) 14
2.8 Enzymes Involved in Cassava Retting 16
2.8.1 Amylase 17
2.8.2 Pectinases 19
2.8.3 Microbial Linamarase (β-glucosidase) 20
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 Materials and Methods 21
3.1 Sample Collection 21
3.2 Retting Procedure 21
3.3 Sample Preparation for Microbial Enumeration 21
3.4 Microbial Population Studies 22
3.4.1 Media used 22
3.5 Identification of Isolates 22
3.5.1 Bacteria 22
3.5.2 Fungal identification 26
3.6 Determination of Activities of Microbial Enzymes During Cassava Retting 26
3.6.1 Production of Amylase enzyme 27
3.6.2 Production of Cellulases enzyme 27
3.6.3 Screening of Isolate for pectinase Activity 27
3.7 Antibiotic Susceptibility Tests 28
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 Results 29
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendations 40
5.1 Discussion 40
5.2 Conclusion 42
5.3 Recommendations 43
References
LIST OF TABLES
Table Title Page
4.1. Identification and characterize of bacterial Isolate from retting cassava samples 31
4.2. Identification and characterize of Fungal Isolates 32
4.3. Total viable microbial count of retting cassava samples 33
4.4. Distribution of Isolates from the retting cassava samples 36
4.5. Percentages occurrence of isolates from the retting cassava samples 37
4.6. Enzymatic Activities of Isolates 38
4.7. Antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial isolates from retting cassava sample 39
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Title Page
2.1: Chemical Structures of Some Cyanogenic Glycosides 6
2.2: Location of Cyanogenic glycoside and Linamarase in the plant cell 8
AGU, A (2020). ENZYMATIC POTENTIALS OF MICROORGANISMS FROM CASSAVA RETTING. Mouau.afribary.org: Retrieved Nov 24, 2024, from https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/enzymatic-potentials-of-microorganisms-from-cassava-retting
AGU, AGU. "ENZYMATIC POTENTIALS OF MICROORGANISMS FROM CASSAVA RETTING" Mouau.afribary.org. Mouau.afribary.org, 15 Apr. 2020, https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/enzymatic-potentials-of-microorganisms-from-cassava-retting. Accessed 24 Nov. 2024.
AGU, AGU. "ENZYMATIC POTENTIALS OF MICROORGANISMS FROM CASSAVA RETTING". Mouau.afribary.org, Mouau.afribary.org, 15 Apr. 2020. Web. 24 Nov. 2024. < https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/enzymatic-potentials-of-microorganisms-from-cassava-retting >.
AGU, AGU. "ENZYMATIC POTENTIALS OF MICROORGANISMS FROM CASSAVA RETTING" Mouau.afribary.org (2020). Accessed 24 Nov. 2024. https://repository.mouau.edu.ng/work/view/enzymatic-potentials-of-microorganisms-from-cassava-retting